Your firm is paid for billable hours.
Your articles spend half of theirs typing.
Laabha is the agentic platform that actually fixes this. Two Digital Employees, working inside the TallyPrime your clients already use. The cost of a few article-hours of manual work, replacing weeks of it.
You're not running an accounting firm. You're running a data-entry firm with a CA seal at the bottom.
Pick any Tuesday in your firm. Walk the floor. Count the screens showing a bank-statement PDF on the left and a TallyPrime voucher screen on the right.
That's the workflow. It hasn't changed since 2004.
Every other "AI for accounting" startup founder who's pitched you in the last decade was selling you a dashboard. A new login. A new place to look at data. You bought one, your team didn't use it, and the renewal lapsed.
Laabha is different in one specific way: it doesn't ask your team to learn a new tool. It does the work inside the tool they already use.
30 clients. 90 statements a month. Here's what changes.
| What you do today | What Laabha does | Hours saved / mo |
|---|---|---|
| 90 bank statements × 6 min each manual | 90 statements × preview corrections only | ~ 9 hours |
| 30 clients × 1 hour partner review of articled vouchers | Same review, but on AI-mapped, audit-trailed vouchers | ~ 5 hours |
| 30 clients × 4 hours senior Schedule III prep | 30 clients × 0 hours prep (auto-generated) | ~ 10 hours |
| Total | ~ 24 hrs / mo |
That's roughly 24 hours per month of staff time reclaimed — typically translating to an extra client your senior can serve, or a planning conversation a partner finally has time for.
For what this works out to in your firm's economics, talk to us. We'll quote based on active client count.
Partner review becomes interesting again.
Your reviewing partner today opens a Tally voucher and sees: "Bank Charges — ₹400 — 12-May-2026." They can't tell if that's right. They mostly trust it. Sometimes they don't, and they ask an article, and the article spends 20 minutes reconstructing what happened.
With Laabha, every voucher carries an audit ID in its narration. Your partner clicks the ID, sees the original transaction, the mapping layer that decided ("narration rule" / "historical match" / "AI 73% confidence"), and any edits a senior made before push.
Partner review goes from "rubber-stamp" to "high-leverage." Mistakes get caught earlier. Junior staff get faster feedback. Your articles stop being voucher-entry machines and start being analysts.
A note from Rajkumar.
I've built software for Indian CA firms since 2004. I've seen every "AI for accounting" pitch deck. I've also watched all of them ask Indian CAs to learn a new tool.
Laabha is built around one rule: don't make the CA learn anything. Don't make the article learn anything. The work happens inside the Tally they already use.
If you're a CA partner reading this and you want to talk to me directly — not to a salesperson, not to an SDR — book a demo. I run them personally for the first 50 firms.
— Rajkumar Neelappa, Founder, AxonBOS
15 minutes. One real client's data. Live demo.
Bring a bank statement from a real client. We'll import it on the call. If the preview isn't usable, we won't waste another minute of your time.